🔗 Share this article

Established parties in power are increasingly allowing the far right to set the public discourse, as per a recent study carried out in Germany.

Researchers discovered that this phenomenon has inadvertently helped radical parties by legitimising their ideas and disseminating them more widely.

Analysis Drawing from Over 20 Years of News Reporting

The findings, released in the academic journal on political studies, utilized an automated text analysis of over 520,000 articles from six national newspapers.

Berlin-based researchers observed that as the far right moved from marginal topics in the late 1990s to core subjects like assimilation and migration, established parties progressively adjusted their messaging in reaction.

This adjustment amplified the spread of these concepts and indicated to voters that such positions were legitimate.

Consequences for Democracy

"Public communication by mainstream parties is crucial in the voting performance of the radical right," stated a expert in political behavior participating in the research.

"This element has been underestimated," she noted.

The impact was noticeable even when conventional groups were criticising the radical faction. "You're still giving them attention," the researcher commented. "The main point is that because we live in such a battle for attention, this focus is crucial."

Mainstreaming Phenomenon Throughout Europe

While the study was centered around the German context, this normalisation effect is likely to apply to nations throughout the European continent.

"This is frequently observed in European news outlets," explained another co-author. "Radical groups says something and everyone starts talking about it for several days."

"Although you're opposing it, you're repeating it," he stated.

Toughening of Public Rhetoric

At times, leaders have also hardened their discourse to align with that of the far right.

In a recent discussion, a then national leader called for large-scale deportations and pushed for them to happen "more often and faster."

Comparable examples can be found across Europe, as politicians from countries ranging from the United Kingdom to the French Republic adopt the rhetoric of the far right, especially on immigration.

This has formed an feedback loop that would have been unthinkable a decade ago.

Central Issue: Who Dictates the Agenda?

"{If you're a moderate party and you are talking about societal topics – migration, assimilation – in a way that is dictated by the rhythm of the far right, that's the essence of narrative control," clarified a researcher.

Some parties have gone one step further, attempting to emulate the strict agenda of the radical right, even as research indicates that doing so drives the electorate to cast their ballot for the far right.

Progressive Impact and Public Perception

The extent of information gathered revealed that the impact of radical groups had been progressive and had increased with the passage of time.

"Voter awareness doesn't change from day to day," stated a researcher. "However, when you hear this negative framing around migration every second week, and it is being spread not only by far-right parties but also, for example, by mainstream parties, then of course this storyline gains more traction."

Need for Mainstream Groups to Carve Out Their Distinct Narratives

The research highlighted the necessity for established parties to carve out their distinct narratives, particularly on subjects such as immigration and integration, instead of continuously following the far right.

"It resembles a choreography," said one author. "If the conductor is radical and you're reacting to it, you cannot decide which music should be heard."