🔗 Share this article

Are your professional networking followers viewing you as a industry expert? Are hordes of respondents applauding your advice on expanding your venture? Do recruiters making contact to discuss collaborations?

Should that not be the case, the explanation might be your gender.

The Test: Changing Profile Gender for Increased Reach

Dozens of women joined an organized LinkedIn experiment this week after viral posts indicated that switching their gender to "male" boosted their network presence.

Other testers modified their professional summaries to incorporate what they termed "bro-coded" language - inserting results-driven business buzzwords like "propel", "revolutionize" and "accelerate". Based on reports, their visibility similarly increased.

Algorithmic Bias Questions Brought Up

The improved metrics has led some to speculate whether an inherent gender bias in LinkedIn's algorithm prioritizes male users who employ professional networking terminology.

Like many large networking sites, LinkedIn utilizes an algorithm to determine which posts are shown to which users - boosting some while reducing others.

Platform Response

Through a blog post, LinkedIn recognized the trend but stated it does not consider "personal characteristics" when deciding content distribution. Instead, the company explained that "hundreds of signals" influence how content are received.

Modifying profile gender on your profile does not affect how your posts shows up in results or timelines.

Individual Results

Simone Bonnett, who changed her gender identifiers to "he/him" and her profile name to "Simon E", reported remarkable results.

"The numbers I'm seeing show a sixteen-fold rise in profile views and a 1,300% increase in content views," she noted.

Another professional, a communications strategist, began experimenting after noticing her audience decline significantly.

The Process

• First, she modified her gender to "man"
• Then, she used AI tools to rephrase her professional summary using "male-coded" wording
• Finally, she repurposed old posts with comparable "agentic" language

The outcome was instantaneous: a more than fourfold rise in reach within one week.

The Downside

Despite the success, Cornish expressed unhappiness with the method.

"Before, my content were softer - concise and insightful, but also warm and human," she explained. "Now, the masculine version was forceful and self-assured - like a Caucasian man swaggering around."

She discontinued the test after one week, stating "Every day I continued, and results improved, I became more frustrated."

Varying Outcomes

Not all testers encountered favorable outcomes. One writer who changed both her gender to "man" and her ethnicity to "Caucasian" reported a decrease in reach and interaction.

"We understand there's systemic preference, but it's very challenging to understand how it operates in specific cases or why," she commented.

Wider Consequences

These tests coincide with ongoing conversations about LinkedIn's unique role as both a professional network and community site.

Recent changes in recent months have reportedly resulted in female creators experiencing significantly reduced exposure, resulting in unofficial tests where identical posts by men and women received dramatically unequal audience engagement.

Technical Explanation

According to LinkedIn, the platform uses artificial intelligence to classify and distribute posts based on various elements, including what's shared and the user's professional identity.

The company states it regularly evaluates its algorithms, including "examinations of gender-related disparities."

Company representative suggested that current reductions in some users' reach might originate from higher volume due to additional posts on the network.

Evolving Environment

According to a tester noted, "bro-coding" appears to be increasing on the platform.

"Users typically consider LinkedIn as more professional and refined," she remarked. "This is evolving. It's becoming increasingly competitive and unpredictable."