🔗 Share this article

Imagine this: a happy Rasmus Højlund wearing Napoli's colors. Next, place that with a dejected the Slovenian forward sporting United's jersey, looking as if he just missed a sitter. Don't bother finding an actual photo of that miss; context is the enemy. Now, include some goal stats in a large, silly font. Don't forget the emojis. Post the image across all platforms.

Would you point out that Højlund's tally features scores in the Champions League while his counterpart does not compete in Europe? Certainly not. And would you note that four of Højlund's goals came against weaker national sides, or that Denmark is much stronger to Sesko's Slovenia and generates far more chances. If you run online for a major brand, pure interaction is your livelihood, Manchester United are the biggest draw, and nuance is your sworn enemy.

So the cycle of online material turns. Your next task is to sift through a lengthy interview featuring the legendary goalkeeper and extract the part where he calls the signing of Sesko "weird". There's a bit, where Schmeichel prefaces his remarks by saying, "Nothing negative to say about Benjamin Sesko"... well, remove that part. No one needs that. Just make sure "strange" and "the player" are paired in the headline. The audience will be outraged.

The Season of Potential and Premature Judgment

The heart of fall has traditionally one of my preferred times to watch football. Leaves fall, winds shift, the teams and tactics are newly formed, everything is new and yet patterns are emerging. Key players of the coming months are staking their claims. The transfer window is shut. No one is talking about the quadruple yet. Everyone are still in the game. At this precise point, anything is possible.

Yet, for similar reasons, this period has long been one of my most disliked times to read about football. For while no outcomes are decided, something must always be getting settled. The City winger is reborn. Florian Wirtz has been a major letdown. Is Antoine Semenyo the best player in the league right now? We need an answer immediately.

The Player as The Prime Example

And for numerous reasons, Sesko feels like Patient Zero in this context, a player inextricably trapped between football's opposing, non-negotiable forces. The need to delay definitive judgment, allowing technical development and strategic understanding to develop. And the demand to generate permanent definitive judgment, a conveyor belt of opinions and memes, out-of-context criticisms and meaningless contrasts, a square that can not truly be solved.

It is not my aim to offer a in-depth evaluation of Sesko's time at United so far. The guy has been in the lineup on four occasions in the Premier League in a wildly inconsistent team, found the net twice, and had a grand total of 116 contacts with the ball. What exactly are we evaluating? Nor do I propose to duplicate the pundits' seminal masterwork "The Sesko Debate", in which two of England's leading pundits duel passionately on a podcast over whether he needs 10 goals to be deemed successful this year (one pundit), or whether it's really more like twelve or thirteen (the other).

A Harsh Reality

For all this I loved watching Sesko at his former club: a powerful, screeching racing car of a striker, playing in a team pitched perfectly to his abilities: given the freedom to attack but also the leeway to fail. And in part this is why United feels like the most unforgiving place he could possibly be right now: a place where "brutal verdicts" are summarily issued in roughly the duration it takes to load a pre-roll ad, the club with the largest and most pitiless gulf between the time and air he needs, and the opportunity he is going to get.

There was an example of this over the national team pause, when a widely shared chart handily stated that Sesko had been judged – by a wide margin – the poorest acquisition of the recent market by a poll of 20 agents. Naturally, the press are not alone in this. Club channels, influencers, unidentified profiles with a suspiciously high number of pornbot followers: all parties with skin in the game is now basically aligned along the same principles, an environment deliberately nosed towards provocation.

The Mental Cost

Endless scrolling and tapping. What is happening to us? Are we aware, on some level, what this endless sluice of aggravation is doing to our minds? Quite apart from the essential weirdness of playing in the center of it all, knowing on a bizarre butterfly-effect level that each aspect about them is now essentially material, commodity, open-source property to be packaged and traded.

Indeed, in part this is because United are United, the entity that keeps nourishing the cycle, a big club that must always be generating the strong emotions. However, in part this is a seasonal affliction, a swing of opinion most visibly and cruelly observed at this season, about a month after the transfer market shut. All summer long we have been coveting players, eulogising them, drooling over them. Yet, just a few weeks in, many of those very players are now being disdained as failures. Should we start to be concerned about a new signing? Was Arsenal's purchase of their striker necessary? What was the purpose of another expensive buy?

The Bigger Picture

It feels appropriate that Sesko meets Liverpool on the weekend: a team at once 13 months unbeaten at home in the Premier League and yet in their own state of perceived turmoil, like filing a a report on someone who popped to the shops 30 minutes ago. Defensively suspect. Mohamed Salah finished. Alexander Isak an expensive flop. Arne Slot losing his hair.

Perhaps we have failed to understand the way the narrative of football has started to replace football itself, to inflect the way we view it, an entire sport repivoted around discussion topics and immediate responses, an activity that happens in the backdrop while we scroll through our phones, unable to detach from the saline drip of takes and further hot takes. Perhaps this player taking the hit right now. However, everyone is losing something here.